Applied Behavior Analysis
Examines observable behavior, its context, and the consequences that may sustain it.
What conditions make this behavior more or less likely?
6 Lens Model™ · Frankie C. Wilson Jr.
When training, reminders, or a new process aren’t translating into action, you need a clearer explanation before you choose another fix. The 6 Lens Model is designed to help you understand overlapping barriers and build one practical intervention plan to test.
Six lenses. One integrated intervention.
Talk through your challenge Explore a practical example01 / The problem
Your staff completed the training, but the new practice isn’t being used. You invited feedback, but few people responded. You provided information, but the next step still feels confusing. These problems can look like a lack of motivation when skills, trust, workload, access, or competing priorities are also involved.
The 6 Lens Model is intended to help you examine those factors together before deciding what to change. It is worth considering when you manage a team or program, several barriers may overlap, and you need a coordinated response you can explain and evaluate.
One shared problem. One integrated intervention. One measurement plan.
02 / The six lenses
A “lens” is a way of looking at the problem. These six research disciplines ask different questions about what people do and why. Their insights are brought together to shape one plan.
Examines observable behavior, its context, and the consequences that may sustain it.
What conditions make this behavior more or less likely?
Examines emotional skills, relationships, and the social conditions surrounding participation.
Do people have the emotional support and relationships they need to act?
Examines interests, perspective-taking, perceived options, and the conditions for workable agreement.
What matters to each person, and where can they find common ground?
Contributes research on the relationships among interpretations, emotions, and behavioral patterns.
How do people’s expectations and interpretations affect their next step?
Examines how framing, perceived value, incentives, and decision context influence choices.
How does the choice environment shape what people do?
Contributes research on the processes involved in motivation, attention, learning, and self-regulation.
What demands does the task place on attention, learning, and self-control?
03 / The synthesis principle
What isn’t working?
What action do you want to support?
ABA · SEL · Negotiation Science · CBT · Behavioral Economics · Behavioral Neuroscience
Where do the findings agree or disagree?
What might explain the behavior?
One coordinated plan to test.
Check what changes; improve the plan.
Imagine that a new work practice isn’t taking hold. Training alone may not address unclear expectations, an awkward process, and concern about asking for help. The analysis considers how those factors interact, where the evidence agrees or disagrees, and what still needs to be understood.
The goal is one coordinated plan whose parts support the same action. A “behavioral mechanism” is the proposed explanation for why that plan might help; measurement lets you examine whether that explanation holds up in your setting.
The model is designed to produce the most defensible integrated intervention supported by the available evidence while making uncertainty explicit.
This diagram describes the public conceptual process. It does not disclose the model’s proprietary implementation.
04 / Standardized output
The intended deliverable is a structured intervention plan: what needs to change, why this response is worth testing, how to put it into practice, and how to judge progress. You should be able to use it in a team conversation, not just read it in a research report.

Your challenge
Tell me what people are being asked to do, what’s happening instead, and what you’ve already tried. We can discuss whether an exploratory application of the model, broader behavioral strategy, or a workshop fits your situation.
Discuss your challenge with FrankieFor researchers: collaboration on the model’s development and evaluation is also welcome.
05 / Scientific positioning
The 6 Lens Model is an integrative framework in development. Its foundations draw from established behavioral disciplines; the integrated model itself has not yet been empirically validated.
Evidence supporting a discipline does not automatically establish the effectiveness of this synthesis. Findings must be assessed for their relevance to the population, setting, target behavior, and intervention being considered.
The research agenda is to test whether the framework can produce consistent, transparent, useful intervention designs and whether those designs improve meaningful outcomes. Clinical findings and neuroscience findings require careful translation into applied settings.
These works inform the underlying disciplines. They are not validation studies of the 6 Lens Model.
06 / Research program
The program is intended to move from conceptual clarity to a documented intervention protocol, then to studies of reliability and preliminary validity.
Conceptual foundations, disciplinary integration, and the rationale for synthesis.
A proposed account of the intervention-design process and its documentation standards.
Planned evaluation of consistency and preliminary validity. Findings are not yet available.
07 / Applications
The model’s intended uses start with a specific action you want to support. These are potential applications, with effectiveness still to be evaluated.
You manage a team that understands a new process but struggles to use it consistently. What needs to change around the task?
You direct a program that needs community input, but the same few people respond. What makes participation difficult or unappealing?
You want everyone to participate, but your information or processes create barriers. How can people understand, choose, and contribute?
You invest in learning or services, but engagement drops before people can benefit. Where does the experience get in their way?
08 / Illustrative case studies
These scenarios illustrate the model’s intended use. They are not completed 6 Lens trials, client outcome claims, or evidence of efficacy.
Authored illustrations of the public concept, not an assessment, a client result, or the model’s proprietary analysis.
Problem
Staff completed training, but a new practice is rarely used in daily work.
Target behavior
Staff use the new practice during a relevant work task.
What happens before and after staff try the practice?
Can staff ask for help or acknowledge uncertainty?
Does the practice fit staff priorities and constraints?
What do staff expect will happen if they try it?
How much effort does the next step require?
What attention and rehearsal does the task require?
Several questions point toward the conditions for supported practice: clear purpose, a usable process, room to rehearse, and helpful feedback.
Observation and staff input are needed to establish which barriers matter in this setting.
One possible integrated intervention
Connect the purpose to a real task, rehearse the practice in that setting, make guidance easy to find, and give useful feedback as part of the same work cycle.
Why it might help: Making practice feasible and supported may help staff use what they learned. This explanation needs testing.
Compare with the starting point, listen to the people affected, and refine the response as evidence develops.
09 / Intellectual-property attribution
The 6 Lens Model™ is Frankie C. Wilson Jr.’s integrative behavioral intervention framework. Its distinct contribution is the proposed synthesis of six disciplines into one coordinated intervention strategy.
The underlying disciplines retain their established scholarly origins. This page presents the model’s public conceptual overview and research direction; proprietary scoring, weighting, thresholds, decision rules, intervention-selection logic, prompts, and algorithms are not disclosed.
Discuss an application or research partnership